Genealogy and Family History in Scotland
  • Home
  • Records
    • Board of Supervision
    • Fathers Found
    • Asylum Patients
    • Sheriff Court Paternity Decrees
    • Sheriff Court Extract Decrees
    • School Leaving Certificates
    • Crown Office Cases AD8 >
      • AD8 index 1890 01
      • AD8 index 1890 02
      • AD8 index 1890 03
      • AD8 index 1890 04
      • AD8 index 1890 05
      • AD8 index 1890 06
      • AD8 index 1890 07
      • AD8 index 1890 08
      • AD8 index 1890 09
      • AD8 index 1890 10
      • AD8 index 1890 11
    • Crown Counsel Procedure Books
    • Registers of Deeds
    • General Register of the Poor
    • Registers of Sudden Deaths
    • Anatomy Registers
  • Resources
    • Scottish Genealogy Sources
    • KINCLAVEN One Place Study >
      • Kinclaven 1911 census
      • Kinclaven Parish Church Books
      • Kinclaven Communion Roll 1880-1894
    • Archives in Scotland map
    • Scottish surnames >
      • Surnames-A
      • Surnames-B
      • Surnames-C
      • Surnames-D
      • Surnames-E
      • Surnames-F
      • Surnames-G
      • Surnames-H
      • Surnames-I
      • Surnames-J
      • Surnames-K
      • Surnames-L
      • Surnames-M
      • Surnames-N
      • Surnames-O
      • Surnames-P
      • Surnames-Q
      • Surnames-R
      • Surnames-S
      • Surnames-T
      • Surnames-U
      • Surnames-V
      • Surnames-W
      • Surnames-Y
      • Surnames-Z
    • Statutes
    • Auchterarder in WWI
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Managed Service Customer Login
    • Tourism Partners Login
  • Shop

Ten years to build a poorhouse

18/8/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
In 1855, Arbroath Parochial Board was considering building a poorhouse:
19th July 1855
​Arbroath. A letter of Messrs Lowson McDonald & Black dated 12th July, with copy minutes of the Parochial Board resolving to erect a Poorhouse, and plans for the Building, were submitted. The Committee approve the resolution to erect a Poorhouse, but delay consideration of the site and plans.
The Board of Supervision, a national organisation based in Edinburgh, was responsible for overseeing implementation of the Poor Law Act of 1845. One of its statutory duties was to consider and approve plans for poorhouses. The Board evidently suggested some alterations to the plans:
24th October 1855
Arbroath. A letter of Messrs Louson, Macdonald and Black, dated 19th October, with Plans of Poorhouse, altered as suggested, and Certificates by Architect and Medical Officer as to fitness of proposed site for Poorhouse, were submitted. The Board approved the site proposed, and continued consideration of the plans.
Eight days later, the Board met again, and signed off on the plans:
1st November 1855
Arbroath. The letters which were before the Board at last meeting, were again submitted with further letter of Messrs Henderson & Son of 29th October, and amended plans of proposed Poorhouse. The Board approved and signed the plans.
The subject then seems to be dropped, for the Board of Supervision minutes do not seem to mention Arbroath's proposed poorhouse for quite some time.

More than eight years later, though, Alexander Brown and six fellow Arbroath ratepayers write to the Board of Supervision with a complaint that seems a familiar one 150 years later:
10th December 1863
​Arbroath - The Board took into consideration a letter from Alexander Brown and six other ratepayers of the Parish of Arbroath complaining of the management of the Parochial Lodging House for paupers - enquiring whether they are legally bound to pay Poor-rates to "uphold drunken paupers" in that house and stating that one of the paupers lodging there had been "two or three times convicted at the Police Court within the last six months for drunkenness".

The "Administrative Committee" of the Parochial Board admits the truth of the allegation regarding the pauper referred to, but states truly that the Parochial Board has no power to prevent the free ingress and egress of Paupers residing in the lodging house and asserts its willingness to assist by all legitimate means in lessening or preventing the waste of the means of the Poor.
​
The Board would suggest for the consideration of the Parochial Board whether one of the most efficient of the legitimate means which they express their willingness to adopt would not be substitute for the present Lodging House that Statutory Poorhouse which in May 1855, the Parochial Board resolved to erect - of which the Plans were approved by the Board of Supervision in November of that year and which the Parochial Board is still under a legal obligation to erect, altho' the Board of Supervision have hitherto abstained from taking measures to enforce that obligation.
This rebuke from the Board of Supervision seems to have prompted the Parochial Board finally to push on with their plans to build a poorhouse, this time as a Combination Poorhouse in conjunction with St Vigeans parish:
8th September 1864
Arbroath Combination Poorhouse - Leters from Messrs J & W McDonald dated 31st August and 5th September with relative sketch of proposed site for poorhouse and certificates by architect and medical officer, were submitted and continued.
A week later, after receiving further correspondence from the builders, together with a map of the site, the Board approved of the site:
15th September 1864
Arbroath Combination Poorhouse - The documents which were before the Board at last meeting were again submitted with further letter from Messrs J & W Macdonald dated 8th September and relative Ordnance Survey map for the parish of St Vigeans with proposed site for the poorhouse marked thereon. The Board approved the site.
Even that was not the end of the matter. It was another five months before the plans were finally approved by the Board, nearly ten years after the initial plans were submitted by the Parochial Board:
​9th February 1865
Arbroath Poorhouse Combination - Two letters from Messrs J & W Macdonald dated 6th February, with plans of proposed poorhouse was [sic] submitted. The Board approved and signed the plans.
Shortly thereafter, the Arbroath Combination Poorhouse finally opened, some ten years after the plans were first submitted.

Sources:
  1. Board of Supervision for Relief of the Poor, Minute Books. National Records of Scotland, HH23/6 p. 95. 19 July 1855
  2. Board of Supervision for Relief of the Poor, Minute Books. National Records of Scotland, HH23/6 p. 123. 24 October 1855
  3. Board of Supervision for Relief of the Poor, Minute Books. National Records of Scotland, HH23/6 p. 125. 1 November 1855
  4. Board of Supervision for Relief of the Poor, Minute Books. National Records of Scotland, HH23/11 p. 53. 10 December 1863
  5. Board of Supervision for Relief of the Poor, Minute Books. National Records of Scotland, HH23/11 p. 155. 8 September 1864
  6. Board of Supervision for Relief of the Poor, Minute Books. National Records of Scotland, HH23/11 p. 208. 9 February 1865
0 Comments

Meals fit for a pauper

21/2/2017

0 Comments

 
This week we've been looking at a wide range of poor law records in preparation for the launch of a new project (coming soon: watch this space). The records of the Board of Supervision - which among other things was responsible for oversight of the operation of the poor relief system in Scotland following the Poor Law Act of 1845 - make for fascinating reading. There are obvious parallels with modern welfare systems, and the tensions inherent in them.

The Board's Sixth Annual Report, published in 1851, includes a report on the Easter Ross Combination Poorhouse, which had been opened the previous year. Written in a dry, slightly bureaucratic style, it describes the progress of what was the first poorhouse in the Highlands:
The Easter Ross poorhouse was erected by nine contiguous parishes. The house was opened on the 1st of October 1850, and the first pauper was admitted on the 11th of that month. I visited the house on Monday and Tuesday, the 4th and 5th of August, and communicated with the inspectors of Tain, Tarbat, Fearn, Logie Easter, Kilmuir Easter, and Rosskeen. Since 11th October 1850 to 5th August, forty-eight paupers had been admitted to the poorhouse, some of them having in the course of that time, left the house, of their own accord, and been again admitted. Five of the forty-eight paupers died at the ages of 70, 50, 71, 20 and 72 years. The immediate causes of the deaths of four were bronchitis, hydrothorax, dysentery, chorea, or St Vitus’s dance. In the fifth case, the cause of death was not entered in the record, the pauper having only very recently died. Three of the forty-eight paupers had been removed elsewhere – one of them to a lunatic asylum – four had left the house of their own accord, and had not applied for re-admission: thus at the date of my visit, there were only thirty-six paupers in the house, leaving accommodation vacant for upwards of 120. The appearance of the inmates was good, and the cleanliness maintained throughout the establishment unexceptionable. The governor appears to be well suited for the office, and keeps all his books with great neatness and regularity. The objectionable points of the management are:
  • That there is no porter – and as the governor cannot always be at the gate, which is allowed to remain unlocked, the inmates may, if they please, wander from the poorhouse without leave, which indeed has sometimes happened;
  • That too much liberty seems to be given to the inmates to leave the poorhouse – as, however, the inmates are for the most part either very aged or bed-ridden, there does not seem to have been any abuse of the power, which the members of the committee have taken, of granting leave of absence to paupers wishing to visit their relatives for a limited period. It is, however, to be feared that such a general power of granting leave of absence, if acted upon to any extent, would lessen much the wholesome feeling of restraint, one of the moral benefits derivable from a poorhouse;
  • That there is not such a book for the observations of the visiting committee, as is prescribed by Rule XIV of the General Poorhouse Rules; and
  • That the drains for carrying off the foul water, cause, from their open state, a stench along the highway, amounting to a public nuisance.

The complaint that inmates are often free to come and go as they please suggests that the reporter, Mr Peterkin, was of the view that paupers should be kept out of sight. Another obvious concern - a common theme today for welfare systems - is the cost. Peterkin continues:
During the first two quarters of the operation of the poorhouse, the parochial board of Rosskeen issued sixty orders for admission to paupers on the roll; of that number, only ten availed themselves of the order – all the others refused to enter the house, and were consequently struck off the roll. Seven of them were, however, subsequently admitted to outdoor relief, but four at smaller allowances than they formerly had. All the others, forty-three, have supported themselves since without parochial assistance. It appears, too, that adding the out-door allowances, which (if there had been no poorhouse), would have been payable to the paupers who took advantage of the orders of admission, to the allowances of the paupers who have supported themselves without parochial relief, for two quarters and a half, a sum would be given equal to £59 19s. whereas, the exxpense of the paupers in the poorhouse, for maintenance and general expenses for three quarters, amounted to only £58 8s 1 1/4d. Thus Rosskeen has afforded relief to their paupers, under a poorhouse system, for three quarters of a year, for a less sum than that which would have been required to give outdoor relief for two quarters and a half, supposing no poorhouse had existed.
​
In Kilmuir, during the first two quarters, poorhouse admission orders were given to twenty-nine paupers. Ten availed themselves of these orders, the others refused to enter the house, and were, with four exceptions, struck off the roll, and supported themselves without parochial relief. The out-door allowances, for two quarters and a half, to the paupers who entered the poorhouse, and those who refused to do so and were not subsequently relieved, would have amounted to £30 7s, and the expense of maintaining the paupers in the poorhouse for the same period, and the other charges payable by Kilmuir on account of the poorhouse, amounted to £31 4s 2d.
This also shows that refusal of a place in the poorhouse could lead to all poor relief payments being withdrawn. The fact that many people chose to do so suggests that the poorhouse was viewed as a last resort by desperate people. The Board of Supervision handled appeals from people claiming the relief offered them was inadequate. Many of these appeals were rejected on the basis that the applicant had been offered a place in the poorhouse.

Peterkin's closing remarks also have contemporary counterparts, in the notion that those on benefits have it easy compared to the working population:
Another subject was frequently touched upon by those with whom I conversed on the matter of poorhouses, namely the diet of the inmates – in regard to which, a rather general misapprehension seems to prevail, many conceiving that the diet in a poorhouse would be of such a superior description to that of the people of the country where the poorhouse would be situated that a desire would be created among the paupers of participating in it, although they might have serious objections to the confinement and discipline of the poorhouse itself. Should poorhouses ever spring up in the Western Highlands, the dietary of the Easter Ross house, which is appended, might be adopted by them, except perhaps barley-broth and pea soup, neither of which, so far as I know, are articles of food in general use among the people of the Western Highlands and Islands. Potatoes, herring, oatmeal, and mil would seem to be the requisites of a diet-table for a poorhouse there.
So what was the menu provided for inmates of the Easter Ross Poorhouse? Residents were grouped into three classes: aged and infirm; adults; and children.
Class 1: Aged and infirm persons
Meal
​Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Breakfast
​Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
​Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
​Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
​Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
Dinner
​Potatoes 1 ½ lb
Barley broth 1 ½ pint
Oatcakes 6 oz
Pea soup 1 ½ pints
Potatoes 1 ½ lb
Milk ¾ pint
​Oatcakes 6 oz
Barley broth 1 ½ pint
Oatcakes 6 oz
Rice ¾ ln with ½ pint milk or treacle
​Potatoes 1 ½ lb
Milk ¾ pint
​Oatcakes 6 oz
Pea soup 1 ½ pint
Supper
​Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
​Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
​Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
​Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
​Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
​Meal 3 ounces
Milk or treacle water ½ pint
Class 2: Adult persons
Meal
​Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Breakfast
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
​Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
​Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Dinner
​Potatoes 2 lbs
Barley broth 2 pints
Oatcakes 8 oz
Pea soup 2 pts
Potatoes 2lbs
Herring
​Oatcake 8 oz
Barley broth 2 pts
Oatcake 8 oz
Pea soup 2 pts
Potatoes 2lbs
Herring
​Oatcake 8 oz
Pea soup 2 pts
Supper
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
​Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
​Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Class 3: Children
Meal
​Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Breakfast
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
​Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
​Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Meal 4 oz
Milk or treacle water ¾ pint
Dinner
Potatoes 1lb
Barley broth 1 ½ pt
Oatcake 6 oz
Pea soup 1 ½ pt
Potatoes 1 ½ lb
Herring
​Oatcake 6 oz
Barley broth 1 ½ pt
Oatcake 6 oz
Rice 3 0z with ½ pt milk or treacle
Potatoes 1 ½ lb
Herring
Oatcake 6 oz
Pea soup 1 ½ pt
Supper
Meal 3 oz
Treacle water ½ pt
Meal 3 oz
Treacle water ½ pt
Meal 3 oz
Treacle water ½ pt
Meal 3 oz
Treacle water ½ pt
Meal 3 oz
Treacle water ½ pt
Meal 3 oz
Treacle water ½ pt
Meal 3 oz
Treacle water ½ pt
0 Comments

History talks and events 28 November - 4 December 2016

22/11/2016

0 Comments

 
Upcoming family history talks and events in Scotland, 28 November - 4 December 2016

Note that there may be a small charge for some of these events, and some may be for members only. We will be publishing lists of upcoming talks and events regularly - if you are organising a talk or event relating to Scottish genealogy or history, please let us know and we will be happy to add your events to our list.

Monday, November 28 2016, 3 pm

Early Irish Migrations to Scotland - Difficulties, Debates and DNA

Dr Catherine Swift (Mary Immaculate College, Limerick)

Venue: Room 208, 2 University Gardens, Glasgow

Centre for Scottish and Celtic Studies


Monday, November 28 2016, 7.30 pm

Rossie: The Loch That Disappeared

Prof David Munro

Venue: Age Concern Building, Provost Wynd, Cupar

Cupar Heritage


Monday, November 28 2016, 7.30 pm

Migrants, Benefits and Tax-Avoidance in Glenalmond, 1700-1900

Robin Urquhart, National Records of Scotland

Venue: Pitcairngreen Village Hall

West Stormont Historical Society


Monday, November 28 2016, 7.30 pm

The Pentland Way, a Walk with History

Bob Paterson

Venue: Gibson Craig Memorial Hall, Lanark Road West, Currie

Currie & District Local History Society


Monday, November 28 2016, 7.30 pm

21st Century Archaeology: Trowels, Tourism and High-Tech Trends

Dr Jeff Sanders

Venue: Millennium Room, Cramond Kirk Hall

Cramond Heritage Trust

Dr Jeff Sanders, DigIt 2017, Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, on why the past is good for our future and providing a sneak peek ahead of Scotland’s Year of History, Heritage and Archaeology


Tuesday, November 29 2016, 1 pm

Franciszek Smuglewicz’s James Byres of Tonley and His Family: A Scottish Antiquarian Network in Eighteenth-Century Rome

Dr Lucinda Lax (Scottish National Portrait Gallery)

Venue: Room G16, School of History, Classics and Archaeology, William Robertson Wing, Old Medical School

Scottish Centre for Diaspora Studies

Diaspora Studies Graduate Workshop Series


Tuesday, November 29 2016, 7.30 pm

Fundamentalisms Kilmarnock Origins - Thomas Whitelaw 1840-1917

Mark Nixon

Venue: Kilmarnock College, Hill Street, Kilmarnock

Kilmarnock & District History Group

£2 donation for non-members


Wednesday, November 30 2016, 4 pm

Textiles of the Viking Age

Eva Anderson Strand, Saxo Institute, University of Copenhagen

Venue: Lecture Theatre (109), Gregory Building

University of Glasgow


Wednesday, November 30 2016, 6 pm

Improvement and Landscape: Landownership in Eighteenth-Century Scotland

Micky Gibbard, PhD student, University of Dundee

Venue: Burghfield House, Cnoc an Lobht, Dornoch

University of the Highlands and Islands Centre for History

This seminar is being given as part of the relaunch of the Centre for Scotland’s Land Futures. The evening will commence at 6pm with a wine reception and will be followed by the relaunch and the seminar. More details will follow and booking is essential.


Thursday, December 1 2016, 6 pm - 7.30 pm

Fashion and Function: Costume and textiles from the Dalrymple family collection

Emma Inglis, Curator, NTS

Venue: Newhailes House, Newhailes Road, Musselburgh, EH21 6RY

Newhailes House

£8, including complimentary glass of wine. Limited space, book online


Thursday, December 1 2016, 7 pm

The History of Scottish Gold and Silversmiths & their marks

George Dalgleish

Venue: The 252 Memorial Hall, Betson Street, Markinch

Markinch Heritage Group

Free to members and £2 for non members


Thursday, December 1 2016, 7.30 pm

Wark Castle

Eric Grounds

Coldstream and District Local History Society


Saturday, December 3 2016, 10 am - 12 pm

Health and history: Using medical records in genealogical research.

Louise Williams

Venue: Scottish Genealogy Society Library, 15 Victoria Terrace, Edinburgh, EH1 2JL

Scottish Genealogy Society

Health records can be another source of information to help further your family’s history but they are not found on the usual websites, etc. Louise Williams, Archivist will show what these records contain and where to find them.


Saturday, December 3 2016, 2 pm

To Prove their kindred here The Irish Office of Arms in the 18th Century

Colette O'Flaherty - Chief Herald of Ireland

Venue: Royal Scots Club, Abercromby Place, Edinburgh

The Heraldry Society of Scotland


Saturday, December 3 2016, 7:00pm for 7:45pm

St Andrew Dinner

Elizabeth Roads, LVO - Snawdoun Herald, Lyon Clerk and Keeper of the Records

Venue: Royal Scots Club, Abercromby Place, Edinburgh

The Heraldry Society of Scotland


0 Comments

Feeding the poor

12/11/2016

0 Comments

 
We've written before about the evolution of Poor Law in Scotland. The 1845 Poor Law (Scotland) Act established detailed rules for the provision of poor relief, with a central body - the Board of Supervision - responsible for monitoring its implementation. Before 1845, poor relief, such as it was, was greatly decentralised - parishes were responsible for their own paupers, and the rules were rarely outlined in much detail.

However, a meeting of the heritors, minister and Elders of the parish of Forgue parish in Aberdeenshire did record the rules for poor relief as established by an earlier meeting of freeholders of the county held in Aberdeen on June 6 1751.

Like many Kirk Session minutes, the entry starts with a preamble detailing the sederunt (i.e. the names of those in attendance), and the reason for the meeting:
​At Manse of Forgue the 28th of June 1751 years, being the time fixed for the meeting of the heritors, minr & elders of the parish of Forgue for taking the state of the poor of sd Parish under consideration, in consequence of the repeated Intimations of the Sherriff Substitute of the County of Abdn, there being pnt Theod Morison of Bogny, Alexr Duff of Hatton, Mr Willm Irvine of Corniehaugh, George Phyn of Corse, Mr Alexr Forbes minr, And Harper, Geo Morison, Alexr Horn, Jas Anderson & Alexr Muir elders; When the Resolutions of the freeholders of the County of Abdn met at Abdn the 5th of June curt anent Vagrants & begging poor, wt abstracts of the Laws & proclamations of Council on that Subject were laid before the said Meeting; and in consequence of the sd Laws, Resolutions and repeated Intimations of the Sherriff, the Meeting thought it incumbent and necessary for ‘em to make a Record containing the Resolutions as to the Managemt of the poor, the publick funds and Collections of sd Parish, Present State of the poor and quarterly allowance formerly given ‘em; and to settle what further will be necessary for maintenance of such poor as will be subsisted by the parish of Terms of sd Laws, Proclamations and Resolutions.
One little thing that struck me about this passage - and it's repeated throughout the rest of the minute - is the use of 'em for them. Like many minutes of this period, the text is full of abbreviations - paper was expensive (and perhaps some clerks were keen to minimise their workload), but this is the earliest use of 'em I've come across.

The rules as laid out show some of the same preoccupations as contemporary framing of welfare systems, such as benefit fraud:
​1. The Heritors, minr and Elders agree to use all possible means to detect all Impostors, and to prevent any person from being entered upon the poor Roll of sd parish but such as are unable & uncapable to maintain emselves either in whole or in part.
The next clause is reminiscent of modern concerns about the "workshy":
​2. That such as are able to work for a part of their Subsistence either at Husbandry or Manufactures, shall be obliged to do it, & supply’d for the remainder only; and if they refuse to work confirm to their Ability, that they are to have no Relief and to be prosecuted as Law directs.
Families were expected to look after their own:
​3. That parents when able are to maintain their children, and children their parents, in whole or in part, which if they refuse to do they are to be prosecuted before the Sherriff in terms of Law.
The fourth clause shows that paupers were expected to repay their benefits, even after death. Parish accounts often include details of roups (auctions) of the goods of paupers who died, showing that poor relief was often a loan, rather than a grant:
​4. That all Persons before they be put upon the Poors Roll be made to convey to the Kirk Session of the Parish whatever effects they shall be possessed of or intituled to at Death (unless on the event of their circumstances being altered by succession or legacies sometime before their Death, or upon their repaying to the Session the full Extent of what was given out for their former support), in which Event the Session is to repone em, but in no other event are they to repone who once accept of a full subsistence; and such as accept of a partiall subsistence may be reponed by the Session at any time upon prepaying what was formerly given them.
We have 18th-century benefit caps:
​5. That no more shall be allowed to any person but one peck of meal for each week, or the value thereof, unless upon extraordinary occasion & when done by consent of heritors, minr and Elders.
And "work for benefits". These sort of schemes were quite common - we've come across one parish that turned this approach into a competition, with a premium (meaning a prize) for the best spinners/weavers:
​6. And in order to afford work to such of the poor as have not trades to buy flax or wool to ‘emselves, the Session agrees, that if no manufacturers will trust em, they will be Caution to such manufacturers or Merts for the value of the wool or Lint given to such Poor by their Advice, if not returned when manufactured, in order to put such poor people aworking what they can for their own Support, that the Parish may be relieved.
Parishes were keen to avoid liability for incomers, instead returning them to their parish of origin. (Resetter in this context means someone providing support, shelter or protection).
​7. The meeting further agree that none shall be received upon the poors Roll but such as have resided three years in the Parish; and if any poor shall intrude the Constable for the District be called to remove ‘em; and that the Resetters of any such be prosecuted.
Landholders were liable for checking the papers of their tenants, and - if they fell ill and became unable to work - for returning them to their home parishes:
​8. The Meeting also agree that every Heritor, tenent or subtenent that shall bring in any person upon the Parish who shall become uncapable to maintain emselves before the three years of Residence shall expire, by which they are intituled to Charity, whoever brings them into the parish shall be bound to maintain such Persons untill he transmit ‘em to their legall place of Residence for their maintenance; and that none shall be resett as a tenent or subtenent, but such as bring along with them certificates from the Parishes where they formerly resided.
Children found begging and orphans could be forced into bonded labour in return for food and clothing:
9. And as by the Laws it is enacted, that if Children be found begging under the age of fifteen, any person may take such Children before the Heritors, minr & Elders, & record their Names & enact emselves to educate such Child to trade or Work, such Child shall be oblidged to serve the person until the 30th year of his or her age for meat & cloath, and this not only to extend to the Children of Beggars but also to poor Children whose Parents are dead, or with consent of the parents if alive; if any such Children be found, the meeting agree that the Law in Relation to ‘em take place.
Poor relief was funded from church collections. Even in 1751 - nearly a century before the Poor Law (Scotland) Act was passed - there was concern that collections were insufficient to meet the needs of poor relief. (In fact, the 1845 Act was at least partly a consequence of the Disruption of 1843 and the formation of the Free Church - Church of Scotland parishes were responsible for poor relief for everyone in the parish, regardless of which church they belonged to: the Disruption meant that an ever-smaller number of people (Church of Scotland congregations) were responsible for poor relief. The 1845 Act stipulated that where a mandatory assessment was levied, responsibility for poor relief was transferred from Kirk Sessions to the newly established Parochial Boards:
​10. They further resolve, that in the Event of the Congregation withdrawing the ordinary Collection, which formerly was the only support the poor had, every labouring servant if draws ten pounds scots of fee or above, shall be yearly assessed in six shillings Scots, and every servt that draws ten merks in thre shillings Scots, and every Grassman that pays 20 merks & below in 3 shillings Scots, and from 20 pounds to fifty merks yearly rent in 6 shill Scots, the masters to be accountable for the servt’s proportions which is to be put to accts of their wages; and it is not doubted by the principal Tacksmen will continue their Collections as formerly, as the maintenance of the poor will at last recur upon ‘emselves.
The final clause stipulated that penalties for moral transgressions were to be fixed, and used for poor relief. This particular clause is a little unusual, in that it makes explicit that "sinners" could avoid ritual public humiliation by paying an additional penalty, an option that would only be available to relatively well-off parishioners. It was in fact a common practice, but it's usually not explicitly mentioned in the records.
​11. They further agree that the least fine that shall be exacted from any fornicator shall be five pounds Scotch; and it is the Opinion of the Heritors that the minr and Sess when they think fit may dispense with the public appearances upon the stool for paymt of a Guinea each; which sums when so paid, are to be annually applyd for maintenance of the Poor. And that the minr and session before Absolution require the Parents of Children thus begotten to enact emselves & find Caution to free the Parish of the Charge of the Children; and in Case of their Refusal, to cause the Constable summon every Person refusing before the Sherriff of Abdn and transmit to the pro[curato]r fiscal an Extract of their judicial confession in order to have the law there anent enforced.
It's striking to see many of the current concerns about benefits payments reflected in rules laid down over 250 years ago. These rules help clarify the position many people found themselves in the 18th century, usually through no fault of their own. It's also a useful guide to the practical operation of poor law in Scotland 90 years before national rules were codified in the 1845 Act for The Amendment and better Administration of the Laws Relating to the relief of the Poor in Scotland.
0 Comments

Death of a pauper

16/9/2016

0 Comments

 
This week we've been looking at the records of the Board of Supervision, a body established under the Poor Law (Scotland) Act of 1845 to implement the reformed system of poor relief in Scotland, and to act as an appeals body. The Board of Supervision lasted for 50 years until it was replaced when poor relief was transferred from Parochial Boards to local authorities.

We came across one noteworthy case which illustrates several aspects of the operation of the Board of Supervision and the workings (or, in this case, failings) of the poor relief system. The case first appears with no mention of the name of the poor man:
Thursday 30th November 1871
Urquhart (Inverness) – A letter from Dr John Fergusson, dated 27th November, requesting the Board to investigate death of a pauper alleged to have been wrongously removed to the Poorhouse was submitted. The Board directed the Secretary to transmit a copy of Dr Fergusson’s letter to the Procurator Fiscal, and to enquire where he is to make an investigation, as in that even the Board will suspend their action until the Crown Officers have either taken proceedings or have resolved not to do so.
The Board were usually fairly scrupulous about gathering evidence, and as such many cases dragged out for extended periods. The next mention of the case is nearly two months later.
Thursday, 11th January 1872
Urquhart (Inverness) – The letter of Dr John Fergusson, dated 27th November, respecting the case of Alexander McDonald, alleged to have been wrongously removed to Inverness Poorhouse, which caused his death shortly after his admission to the Poorhouse, which was before the Board on 30th November, and letters from the Governor of Inverness Poorhouse, dated 30th November, Mr Charles Stewart, Procurator Fiscal at Inverness, dated 2d December, Mr G Ellice, dated 4th December, Mr Charles Morton, Crown Agent, dated 27th December, and Inspector of Urquhart, dated 4th January 1872, thereanent, were submitted and directed to be circulated among the Legal Members.
Four weeks later, the Board again considered the evidence
​Wednesday, 7th February 1872
Urquhart (Inverness) – The documents which were before the Board on 11th January, respecting the case of Alexander Macdonald, whose death is alleged to have been caused by his removal to Inverness Poorhouse, the same having been circulated among the Legal Members, were again submitted, and remitted to the Chairman to draft a Minute.
When it came, the Chairman's verdict was devastating
Thursday, 15th February 1872
Urquhart (Inverness). The documents respecting the case of Alexander McDonald, whose death is alleged to have been caused by his removal to Inverness Poorhouse, which were before the Board at last meeting, were again submitted (together with a Draft Minute by the Chairman). The Board approved the Draft Minute, which is as follows:

The Board have carefully perused the Precognition taken by the Procurator-Fiscal of Inverness-shire regarding the death of Alexander Macdonell or Macdonald, which was transmitted to them by direction of Crown Counsel for their consideration, and in order that they might take such steps as they might think proper. The Board regret to find that the conduct of the Parochial authorities in this case has been most unsatisfactory, and far from creditable to themselves.

It appears that Macdonell was a pauper belonging to Urquhart who resided with his sister in the Parish of Kilmonivaig. He was about 75 or 76 years of age, very frail in body, having been for a considerable time troubled with a severe chronic cough, and much confined to the house and bed, and almost am imbecile in mind. The Parochial Board of Urquhart, being dissatisfied with the amount of outdoor relief which the pauper was receiving, ordered his removal to his own Parish and subsequently to the Poorhouse at Inverness. The Medical Officer of Kilmonivaig certified, of date 15th June 1871, that the pauper was “in an unfit state to be removed”, and of date 24th August 1871, that he was “not in a fit state to be removed to the Poorhouse without serious injury to his health”. Both these certificates were given on soul and conscience. The Parochial Board of Urquhart, nevertheless, resolved to adhere to their previous determination, and on the 2d October 1871 they requested their Chairman and Deputy Chairman to arrange with their Medical Officer and Inspector for the pauper’s immediate removal from Glengarry to the Inverness Poorhouse. Accordingly upon the 17th or 18th of October the Medical Officer of Urquhart visited the pauper at his sister’s house in Glengarry, and granted a certificate, of date 18th October, to the effect that he considered him “a fit case for Hospital or Poorhouse treatment”. This certificate was not given on soul and conscience, and it was also defective in respect it did not bear that the pauper could be removed to Inverness (a distance of upwards of 40 miles) without injury to his health, and did not prescribe (as in such a case it should have done) the mode of conveyance to be used in effecting the removal.

The Inspector of Urquhart proceeded to Glengarry on the 25th of October, and forcibly removed the pauper to Glen Urquhart upon a wet stormy day in an open conveyance, although it appears that at Glengarry the defective character of the certificate upon which the Inspector was about to act was pointed out to him, and it was further suggested to him that the pauper, if removed at all, should be conveyed either in a close carriage or by the steamer.

On the 27th of October, the pauper was forwarded from Glen Urquhart to the Poorhouse at Inverness with the concurrence of the Medical Officer of Urquhart, but again he was conveyed in an open carriage, notwithstanding his delicate state of health and the inclemency of the season.

The unfortunate pauper died in the Poorhouse on the 25th November, but there does not appear to be evidence directly and distinctly connecting the death with the removal, and it is probably on that account that Crown Counsel have directed the Precognition to be transmitted to the Board, instead of ordering proceedings to be taken as a criminal charge. On the other hand, it is obvious that the removal and the manner in which it was executed could not have been beneficial to the health of the pauper, and there is but too much probability that they must have been prejudicial to it.

The Board are of opinion that this was not a case in which the power of removal should have been exercised at all. It was not a case in which the application of a test was requisite, and no reasonable person could suppose that the poor old man’s comfort would be increased by removing him from his sister’s care to a distant Poorhouse. The sole reason for removing the pauper was a difference of opinion between the Parochial authorities of Urquhart and Kilmonivaig as to the proper amount of outdoor allowance, and that question might have been settled by an appeal to this Board. As regards the mere matter of expense, the last month of the pauper’s life (including the cost of removal and the Poorhouse charges) was probably after all more costly to the Parish of Urquhart than any previous month of the pauper’s chargeability. It appears, therefore, to the Board that the Parochial Board of Urquhart acted neither wisely nor humanely in ordering this pauper to be removed to Inverness.

​The Board are further of opinion that the Inspector or Urquhart committed a grave error of judgment in removing the pauper upon a manifestly defective certificate, and in a manner obviously improper in the circumstances of the case. The Inspector appears to have had at the time some misgivings as to the propriety of the course he was pursuing, and he seems to have considered that he was bound to carry out the wishes of his Chairman and Deputy Chairman, and that he would not have been justified in incurring the additional expense of a journey in the steamer or a close carriage. It is, therefore, necessary to inform him that even in executing a competent and legal order of the Parochial Board, an Inspector of Poor is responsible for carrying out his instructions in a legal, proper and humane manner. The Board consider the conduct of the Inspector of Urquhart in this case to have been highly culpable, and they hereby censure him for it.
Even through the bureaucratic politeness, it's clear that the Board believed that the Inspector's actions were a factor in the death of poor Alexander Macdonald. They didn't however go so far as to dismiss him - something that in other cases they were willing to do.

The Board of Supervision had a dual role - providing guidance to the local officers responsible for the operation of the Poor Law, and acting as an appeals body for applicants dissatisfied with the amount of support they received. We are currently indexing the appeals cases considered by the Board from its inception in 1845 to its abolition in 1895, and will be publishing the index in the next few months. Watch this space!
0 Comments

They call him the wanderer

5/9/2016

0 Comments

 
We've written before about the 1845 Act for The Amendment and better Administration of the Laws Relating to the relief of the Poor in Scotland, which as the name suggests changed the way in which Poor Laws operated in Scotland. As well as formalising on a statutory basis the operation of what would over time evolve into the modern benefits system we know today, the Poor Law (Scotland) Act 1845, as it is often referred, led to the establishment of Parochial Boards in each of the parishes of Scotland. This laid the foundations for the established of local, civil government in Scotland. Under the 1845 Act, Parochial Boards were responsible for administering poor relief.

Parochial Boards would meet regularly to consider the state of Poors Funds in their parish, and to discuss applications for relief. Poor relief was paid by Parochial Boards, which were always keen to minimise their expenditure. Liability was determined by the long-established - and often contentious - system of settlement. While in theory the rules of settlement were relatively clear, there was always room for disputes between Parochial Boards keen to avoid spending their limited resources. As with Kirk Sessions determined to find someone to pay for illegitimate children, it was all about the money.

In most instances, determining the parish of settlement of a pauper or applicant for relief was fairly straightforward - after all, most people didn't move around all that much. That was not, however, always true, as the case of George Thomson shows.

The first time we come across George is in the Treasurer's Accounts of Drumoak parish, in Aberdeenshire:
​1847, June 13
By Cash to George Thomson in need, £1
Three weeks later, he's mentioned again:
​1847, July 4
Cash to George Thomson, 6/-
Another three weeks later, he's mentioned in less happy circumstances
1847, July 25
Cash to Widow of George Thomson, 12/-
George has died, and his widow is now in receipt of parochial aid. Another three weeks passes, and George is no longer mentioned by name
Friday 13 August 1847
Widow Thomson, 6/-
In order to qualify for parochial relief under the 1845 Act, George would have had to apply to the Parochial Board, satisfying them that he was in genuine need, and that he was settled in the parish. At first, the Parochial Board minute is not particularly interesting:
Church of Drumoak 13 August 1847
It was reported that on 12 June last George Thomson, labourer at Burnside in this Parish, had applied for temporary relief to himself, wife, and four children, which had been granted. That he died on 11 July, and that his wife had since become chargeable as a Pauper in this Parish. That some time previous to his death the Inspector had taken in writing a declaration of the different places in which he had resided – which was to the following effect
However, the detail provided by George in his account is remarkable:
​That George Thomson, late husband of Ann Gillespie, was born at Little Mill of Cairney, that his father George Thomson is still alive and is resident at Foggy-Moss in said Parish. That he left his father’s when 13 years of age to be servant to Joseph Horne in Netherton of Cairney, with whom he resided six months; that he then went to serve John Christie in Busswarney in the Parish of Cairney, where he resided 2 ½ years; that he afterwards was in the service of Isaac Robertson, Banks of Cairney, 6 months; that he then went to Alexander Christie, Gangdurnas, parish of Cairney, with whom he resided 6 months; and thence to Charles Bruce in Broadland of Cairney, whom he served six months. That he then removed from his native Parish and entered the service of James Pirie, Culithie of Gartly, with whom he remained for 2 ½ years; that he afterwards went to the Revd Mr Leslie, assistant to the Minister of Rathven, where he remained 6 months; that he then went to James McCulloch, Cleffes in the parish of Grange, and continued with him 6 months; that he thence went to work with a contractor in whose service he worked in different parishes for short periods, and then removed to Fyvie for 6 or 8 weeks, and then to the parish of Belhelvie where he resided with a William McDonald for about 15 months; that he then resided six months with William Stronach carpenter in the parish of Nigg; that he thence removed to the parish of Fordoun and lived with Deacon Bruce innkeeper, Auchinblae about a month; that he then resided with Peter Laing in Banchory Ternan a month, and went to Kincardine O’Neil, where he lodged in the house of William Cooper for about six months. That he then removed to Banchory Ternan and was married 20 June 1840 to Ann Gillespie. That from Martinmas 1841 to the month of September 42 he earned his livelihood by working at Countesswells in the Parish of Peterculter or Banchory Devenick, visiting his family every Saturday night and continuing with them till Monday morning, as long as they resided in Banchory Ternan. That on the 7th of June 1842 his wife and family removed from said Parish of Banchory Ternan to this parish (Drumoak), he himself continuing to earn his livelihood at Countesswells, residing first in the house of Archibald Leslie and then in that of Alexander Watt, crofters in Loanhead of Countesswells. That he continued as before visiting his family every Saturday night and continuing with them until Monday morning till the month of September 1842 when he took up his regular residence in this parish, and resided till his death on 11th July 1847.
Clearly George moved around quite a lot. Based on this declaration, the Board decided that they were not liable for relief payments:
The Board taking the matter under consideration were of opinion that his widow and family had no claim upon this parish, but that Cairney was the parish of settlement, and instructed the Inspector to forward a statement of the case to the Inspector of said parish of Cairney.
Although the Board did not believe they were liable, they continued to make payments to Ann, as we can see if we return again to the Treasurer's accounts:
1847 Octr 3 Seven weeks aliment to Widow Thomson, £1 1s

Thursday 18 November 1847
Widow Thomson, £1 1s

1848 Jany 2
Widow Thomson, [5s]

Wednesday 23 Feby 1848
Widow Thomson, 15s

The day after making this last payment, the Board met again to consider this case. Ann offered some more information about her circumstances:
Drumoak 24 February 1848
The meeting proceeded to revise the Poors Roll and the Inspector having given in his report on the state of the Poor, it was agreed to continue the present allowance to all the paupers on the Roll with the exception of Widow Thomson, who gave in a claim for an increased allowance. Said Widow Thomson was called in and being examined stated that she pays thirty shillings of rent yearly for her present house and yard, that she has four children, the eldest six years of age and the youngest about two years of age, that she receives three shillings of board from her late husband’s brother who lives with her pursuing the occupation of a tailor, who also affords light. The Board having considered this case dismissed the complaint, and thereafter resumed consideration of the liability of this parish to maintain said Widow Thomson, and the Inspector having laid on the table a letter which he had received from the Inspector of the Poor of the Parish of Cairney intimating that they considered Drumoak as the parish of the woman’s settlement. The meeting agreed to refer the case to arbiters mutually chosen if the Inspector of Cairney will agree to that arrangement, and if not, they instruct their Inspector to bring a legal action against the Inspector of said parish of Cairney with a view to recover the money already advanced for relief in this case.
While the Board waits for a response from the Inspector at Cairney, they continue to pay George's widow Ann:
​1848, March 26 By 4 weeks aliment to Widow Thomson, 12s
1848, April 30 By 4 weeks aliment to Widow Thomson, 12s
Friday 12 May 1848 4 weeks aliment to Widow Thomson, 12/-
They didn't have to wait too long for a response
​Drumoak 12 May 1848
…
A letter was then laid on the table the tenor whereof follows

Cairney 27th April 1848
Sir,
Case of Widow Thomson & Family
Before giving a final answer regarding this case I have to request that you will have the goodness to inform me in what capacity George Thomson was employed while working at Countesswells in the parish of Peterculter from the 7th of June to the month of September 1842.
I am, Sir, your ob[e]d[ien]t serv[an]t
(Signed) Wm Taylor, inspector

The meeting instructed the Inspector to write to the Inspector of Cairny that George Thomson was employed as a contractor during the period referred to in the above and instructed him farther to remind him that the application was made prior to 7 June 1847, until which time even the widow and family of said George Thomson have not acquired an industrial residence in this parish.
Apparently the Inspector at Cairney is not keen to pay for Ann's maintenance either. Meanwhile, the bills continue to mount for Drumoak
1848 July 30 By Widow Thomson’s 8 weeks aliment, £1 4s
1848 Septr 10 Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1848 Octr 22 Wid Thomson 8 1/3 weeks aliment, £1 5s
Five months later, the Board meets again
Drumoak 31 Oct 1848
…
A letter was then laid upon the table from the Inspector of the Poor of the Parish of Cairney relative to Widow Thomson & family the tenor whereof follows

Cairney 19th August 1848
Sir
Case of Widow Thomson & family
At a special meeting of the Parochial Board held to day for the purpose of considering & finally disposing of this case, I have been instructed to intimate to you that they refuse to recognise the claim.
I am, Sir, your ob[e]d[ien]t servt
(Signed) Wm Taylor, Inspector

​The meeting being clearly of opinion that Widow Thomson had no claim on this parish but on Cairney instructed their Inspector to give the case into the hands of John Blaikie Esq, Advocate, Aberdeen and request him to raise an action against the Inspector of Cairney for the Recovery of the sums paid to Widow Thomson by the Parochial Board of Drumoak, and to intimate the same to the Inspector of Cairney.
Cairney Parochial Board decide to call Drumoak's bluff, refusing outright to pay anything. Drumoak respond by calling in the lawyers, and going to court. In the meantime, they continue to pay Ann
1848
Novr 19 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
Decr 17 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1849
Jany 21 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1849 Feby 18 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1849 March 11 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1849 April 8 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1849 May 13 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1849 June 10 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1849 July 1 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1849 July 12 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1849 Septr 2 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1849 Octr 18 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1849 Novr 8 By cash to Wid Thomson 8 weeks aliment to 17th Novr 1849, £1 4s
1849 Decr 16 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1850 Jany 13 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
Finally, two and a half years after George initially applied for temporary relief, a resolution of sorts is achieved in court:
Drumoak 31st January 1850
…
The Inspector reported that he had received an intimation from Messrs Blaikie Advocates, Aberdeen, to the effect that the Sheriff on appeal had finally decided the case of Widow Thomson (referred to in the minute of 31st October 1848) with expenses against the parish of Cairnie and that after deducting necessary expenses a balance of £13 was due to this parish.
The treasurer of Drumoak records the payment received from the lawyers
1850 Jany 31
Received from the Messrs Blaikie balance due by them on account of Parochial Board of Cairney, £13
Now that liability has been established on the park of Cairney, the Parochial Board are perfectly happy to continue making payments to Ann
​1850 Feby 10 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1850 March 10 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1850 March 24 By cash school coal money for Wid Thomson’s children 2/- and for a school book 1/9
1850 April 7 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
1850 May 6 By cash to Wid Thomson 4 weeks aliment, 12s
Having initially denied liability, Cairney Parochial Board accept the court ruling, and reimburse Drumoak
​1850 July 14, Received advances made to Wid Thomson by this Session on account of the Parish of Cairney, £3 15s 9d
As well as providing an extraordinary amount of information about the working life of George Thomson, and the domestic arrangements of his family both while he is alive and after he dies, these entries also give a good illustration of how the system of poor relief operated in Scotland after the reforms of 1845.
0 Comments

V is for Visitations

26/4/2016

0 Comments

 
As mentioned in a previous post, for many years Kirk Sessions had responsibility for maintaining the poor of their parish. As well as administering financial support – often referred to as outdoor relief, in the sense of providing support outwith a poorhouse – some sessions also maintained records of visitations. These involved representatives of the Kirk Session periodically visiting the poor of the parish. Not many of these records survive, but where they do, they can be extremely interesting.

One parish where they do survive is Scone, in Perthshire. Included at the end of the Parochial Board letter book are a series of Notes on visits to the poor. There are 93 entries, so we thought we'd index them.
Visits to the Poor, Scone [NRS Reference CH2/803/3
Forename Surname Address
Margt Alison New Scone
Jean Banks
John Barnet New Scone
Mary Bett
Elizabeth Blair New Scone
Euphemia Blair Quarreymill
James Blair
Margaret Blair New Scone
James Campbell
Widow Campbell Balbeggie
Janet Carmichael New Scone
Ann Christie
Widow Cochrane New Scone
Widow George Cochrane New Scone
Isabella Cock
Widow Cock
Jn Dewar
Peter Douglas New Scone
Widow Dow New Scone
Widow Dow New Scone
John Fenwick
William Fisher
James Foundling
Widow Fraser New Scone
Wid Gairns Perth
Widow Gall New Scone
David Galletly New Scone
James Galletly New Scone
Mary Galletly
Widow Galletly
Widow Galletly
John Gardiner New Scone
Robert Garvie
Robert Gillespie New Scone
Janet Halket New Scone
Andrew Hill near Perth
Widow Hill New Scone
Thomas Huchan Stormontfield
Eliz Innes
Margt Jackson New Scone
Alexander Lamb New Scone
Alfred Lawrence New Scone
Margt Mackay New Scone
James Marshall New Scone
James Martin Perth
Widow Mcdonald Balthayock
Widow Mcdonald Perth
David Mcfarlane
Janet Mcfarlane New Scone
James Mcgregor New Scone
Jean Mcgregor New Scone
Alexr Mckenzie New Scone
Daniel Mckenzie New Scone
Jane Mclaggan
John Mclaren New Scone
Janet Mcnaughton Morningside
Widow Mcpherson
Jane Menzies
Orphans Menzies New Scone
Widow Menzies New Scone
Alexr Milne
Agnes Mitchell
Donald Munrae
Ebenezer Munrae New Scone
Andrew Noble New Scone
Widow Ogilvie New Scone
Margt Ower Bridgend
Widow Pairnie Balboughty
Charles Patullo New Scone
Robt Peddie
Eliz Peebles
James Robb
Widow Robertson
Widow Robertson
Ann Rogers Perth
Widow Roup
Widow Shepherd New Scone
William Sime
Widow Small New Scone
Widow Peter Small
Thomas Smith Balgarire
Widow Stewart Lethendy
William Strang
Widow Turnbull
Widow Waddel New Scone
Widow Wallace Calenden
Cath Watt New Scone
Mary West
Isabella Whitelaw Lethendy
Janet Whitelaw
Rachel Whitelaw Lethendy
Peter Young
Thomas Young
​One entry – or rather series of entries – in particular, caught our attention. The entries start in 1846:
Isabella Whitelaw’s children, Lethendy Moar
1846
24 July Admitted 4 May 1846 – on imprisonment of mother
24 December – seem tolerably attended to by grandfather
1847
13 July – Removed from Roll 3rd August on release of mother
[NRS Reference CH2/803/3 p. 235]
​Isabella Whitelaw had been arrested and brought before the Police Court, as reported on 23 April 1846 in the Northern Warder and General Advertiser for the Counties of Fife, Perth and Forfar:
​Janet Gall or Cochrane, and Isabella Whitelaw, charged with several separate acts of theft some of which were committed beyond the bounds of Police, were handed over to the Sheriff.
​Her conviction was reported a few months later:
Sheriff Court
Tuesday July 14
Janet Gall or Cochrane, wife of John Cochrane, porter, Perth, and Isabella Whitelaw, Muir of Lethendy; Cochrane and Whitelaw charged with theft of clothes from the person of a girl of weak intellect, and Whitelaw of several acts of falsehood, fraud and wilful imposition; both have been previously convicted of both charges, and Cochrane has been eight months in the general prison; sentenced to twelve months each in general prison.

​[Northern Warder and General Advertiser for the Counties of Fife, Perth and Forfar 16 July 1846]
All seemingly goes quiet for the Whitelaw children for a couple of years, but then we find some more entries in the poor visitations:
Isabella Whitelaw’s two children
1849
17 July. Have been sometime with Aunt, now with Margt Jackson. Well.
1850
3 January. Are well kept with Margt and regularly at school
17 July – both well, mother in Jail
1851
11 January – Both well, and at School. Mother sentenced to 7 year’s banishment
7 August. Ditto
29 December – Nothing particular.
1852
21 July – Oldest girl from school with a slightly burned hand
27 Decr – Both well, and at school
1853
9 July – Much as usual
1854
4 January – Both well, and apparently comfortable.
21 July – Both well and at school
1855
3 Jany – Both well and at school
[NRS Reference CH2/803/3 p. 208]
This time, Isabella’s conviction is reported in the Montrose, Arbroath and Brechin Review
Isabella Whitelaw, Perth, accused of theft – aggravated by previous convictions, was sentenced to seven years’ transportation.
The National Records of Scotland’s 19th century solemn database adds a few more details: that Isabella also went by the name of Helen Panton, that her address was c/o Robert Mills, cadger, Coupar Angus, Perthshire, that she could not write.

We next hear of Isabella as she is transported to Tasmania on board the Aurora, on 22 April 1851. Her arrival in Tasmania is recorded in the Register of Convicts, on 10 August 1851. She is described as a Country Servant, 5 feet 4 inches, age 31, with a ruddy complexion, dark brown hair, brown eyebrows, hazel eyes, and medium facial features. She was a wart on her left arm at the bleeding place.

Her conduct record suggests she wasn’t entirely a reformed character. She was charged for being drunk on October 25 1852. On November 2nd, she was sentenced to 6 months hard labour for being absent without leave. On December 3rd 1852 she was “delivered of an illegitimate child (Mary) at the Cascade Factory”. On 2 October 1854 she was sentenced to 12 months hard labour for absconding. 11 August 1855 saw her being sentenced to 3 months hard labour for being drunk on her master’s premises. A few months later, on 5 November, she was sentenced to another 12 months hard labour for absconding when on a pass. Once more, on 29 June 1857, she was sentenced to one month’s hard labour for being out after hours and absconding.

Shortly after the birth of her daughter, Isabella was granted permission to marry Michael McDermott on 14 December 1852. We have not however been able to find a record of them actually marrying. Things however do appear to have eventually improved for Isabella, as she was again granted permission to marry on 2 December 1856, to William Way, a freeman. They were married at the All Saints Schoolroom on 23 December 1856. William was a cabinetmaker. We have not found any more records of Isabella Whitelaw, and do not know if she ever returned to Scotland or saw her children again.

Isabella Whitelaw's story is an interesting illustration of how one record can lead to another, and can end up telling a fascinating story.
0 Comments

P is for Poor Law, paupers and payments

19/4/2016

1 Comment

 
In January 1843, the Conservative government under Sir Robert Peel established a Commission of Enquiry to study the Scottish system of poor relief. There had been growing concerns about the effectiveness of poor relief in Scotland, which at the time was in the hands of the Kirk Sessions of the Church of Scotland. A few months after the Commission was set up, the Church of Scotland split in the Disruption, with around 40% of ministers leaving to form the Free Church. This further eroded the position of the Church of Scotland, and made substantive reform inevitable.
​
The earliest record of poor law in Scotland dates back to 1425 (not 1424 as is sometimes incorrectly stated). Those aged between 14 and 70 who were able to earn a living themselves were forbidden from begging, on pain of branding for a first offence and execution for a second offence:
Of thygaris nocht to be thollyt
Alsua it is ordanyt that na thigar be thollyt to thyg nor bege nothir in burghe nor to lande betuix xiiij and iij score [and ten] of yheris of age bot thai be seyne be the consall of the toune or of the cuntre at thai may nocht vyne thar leyffing othir vays. And thai that sa beis fundin sall have a takin to land of the schera and in bwrowis off the aldirmen and baylyheis, and that undir the payn of birnynge on the cheyk and bannyssing of the cuntre.

Translation:
Of beggars not to be suffered
Also it is ordained that no beggar be suffered to thig or beg either in burghs or in the land between fourteen and seventy years of age, unless it is seen by the council of the town that they cannot make their living in other ways. And they that are so found shall have a token from the sheriff in the land, and from the aldermen and bailies in the burghs, and that under pain of burning on the cheek and banishing from the country.
[The Records of the Parliaments of Scotland to 1707, K.M. Brown et al eds (St Andrews, 2007-2016), 1425/3/22. Date accessed: 17 April 2016.]
Three years later, the king decreed that officials who failed to implement this act would be fined.

In 1535, the system was further formalised. Poor relief was only to be granted to individuals in their parish of birth, and the “headmen” of each parish were to award tokens to eligible paupers, thereby introducing the concept of a licensed beggar. People caught begging outside of their parish of birth were subject to the same harsh penalties as before.
​
An Act for punishment of the strong and idle beggars and relief of the poor and impotent was passed in 1579. This established the basic system of poor relief which was to continue for hundreds of years.
Sic as makis thame selffis fuilis and ar bairdis or utheris siclike rynnaris about, being apprehendit, salbe put in the kingis waird and yrnis salang as they have ony guidis of thair awin to leif on
[​RPS, 1579/10/27]
​If they had no means of sustenance, their ears were to be nailed to the tron or any other tree, and they were then to be banished. The penalty for repeat offenders was death. As for able-bodied beggars:
​all personis being abone the aige of xiiij and within the aige of lxx yeiris that heirefter ar declarit and sett furth be this act and ordour to be vagabundis, strang and ydle beggaris, quhilkis salhappyne at ony tyme heirefter, efter the first day of Januar nixtocum, to be takin wandering and misordering thame selffis contrarie to the effect and meaning of thir presentis salbe apprehendit; and upoun thair apprehensioun be brocht befoir the provest and baillies within burgh, and in every parochyne to landwart befoir him that salbe constitutit justice be the kingis commissioun or be the lordis of regalities within the samyne to this effect, and be thame to be committit in waird in the commoun presoun, stokkis or irnis within thair jurisdictioun, thair to be keipit unlettin to libertie or upoun band or souirtie quhill thai be put to the knawlege of ane assyse, quhilk salbe done within sex dayis thairefter. And gif they happyne to be convict, to be adjuget to be scurget and brunt throw the ear with ane hett yrne
[​RPS, 1579/10/27]
​So “strong and idle” beggars were to be captured, imprisoned or put in stocks or irons, and brought before a court within 6 days. Upon conviction, they were to be burnt through the ear with a hot iron. The law puts in this caveat:
exceptit sum honest and responsall man will, of his charitie, be contentit then presentlie to act him self befoir the juge to tak and keip the offendour in his service for ane haill yeir nixt following, undir the pane of xx libris to the use of the puyr of the toun or parochyne, and to bring the offendour to the heid court of the jurisdictioun at the yeiris end, or then gude pruif of his death, the clerk taking for the said act xij d. onlie. And gif the offendour depart and leif the service within the yeir aganis his will that ressavis him in service, then being apprehendit, he salbe of new presentit to the juge and be him commandit to be scurgit and brunt throw the ear as is befoirsaid; quhilk punishment, being anys ressavit, he sall not suffer the lyk agane for the space of lx dayis thairefter, bot gif at the end of the saidis lx dayis he be found to be fallin agane in his ydill and vagabund trade of lyf, then, being apprehendit of new, he salbe adjuget and suffer the panes of deid as a theif.
​[​RPS, 1579/10/27]
In other words, the convicted idle beggar would be spared this punishment if someone offered him a job for a year. If he were to leave such employment without his master’s approval, he would be burned through the ear, but if convicted a second time, he would be put to death as a thief.
​
The law then moves on to detail who should be subject to punishment. Not just beggars, per se, but also:
all ydle personis ganging about in ony cuntrie of this realme using subtill, crafty and unlauchfull playis, as juglarie fast and lowis, and sic utheris, the idle people calling thame selffis Egyptianis, or ony utheris that fenyeis thame selffis to have knawlege of prophecie, charmeing or utheris abusit sciences, quhairby they persuaid the people that they can tell thair weardis deathis and fortunes and sic uther fantasticall imaginationes
​​[​RPS, 1579/10/27]
​So people claiming to use witchcraft, self-styled “Egyptians” (i.e. Gypsies or Romanies), those claiming to have the gift of prophecy, charms, or fotune-telling. Other people to be punished include those with no visible means of support, minstrels, singers and storytellers not officially approved, labourers who have left their masters, those carrying forged begging licences, those claiming to be itinerant scholars, and those claiming to have been shipwrecked without affidavits:
​utheris nouthir having land nor maister, nor useing ony lauchfull merchandice, craft or occupatioun quhairby they may wyn thair leavingis, and can gif na rekning how they lauchfullie get thair leving, and all menstrallis, sangstaris and tailtellaris not avowit in speciall service be sum of the lordis of parliament or greit barronis or be the heid burrowis and cieties for thair commoun menstralis, all commoun lauboraris, being personis able in body, leving ydillie and fleing laubour, all counterfaittaris of licences to beg, or useing the same knawing thame to be counterfaittit, all vagabund scolaris of the universities of Sanctandrois, Glasgw and Abirdene not licencit be the rectour and deane of facultie of the universitie to ask almous, all schipmene and marinaris allegeing thame selffis to be schipbrokin, without they have sufficient testimoniallis
​​[​RPS, 1579/10/27]
Those hindering the implementation of the law would be subject to the same penalties. Having established the penalties, the Act requires all poor people to return to their parish of birth or habitual residence within 40 days of this act. Parishes were to be responsible for supporting their native-born paupers or those who had been habitually resident there for seven years, and were to draw up rolls of the poor. Aged paupers could be put to work, and punished if they refused. Children of beggars aged between 5 and 14 could be taken into service until the age of 24 for boys or 18 for girls, and could be punished if they absconded.

An Act of 1597 on “Strang beggaris, vagaboundis and Egiptians” explicitly transferred responsibility for poor relief to Kirk Sessions. The 1649 Act anent the poore introduced a stent or assessment on the heritors of each parish to pay for poor relief.

The 1672 Act for establishing correction-houses for idle beggars and vagabonds ordered the opening of 
correction-houses for receaving and intertaining of the beggars, vagabonds and idle persones within their burghs, and such as shall be sent to them out of the shires and bounds aftir specified
in Edinburgh, Haddington, Duns, Jedburgh, Selkirk, Peebles, Glasgow, Dumfries, Kirkcudbright, Ayr, Dumbarton, Rothesay, Paisley, Stirling, Culross, Perth, Montrose, Aberdeen, Inverness, Elgin, Inveraray, St Andrews, Cupar, Kirkcaldy, Dunfermline, Banff, Dundee, Dornoch, Wick and Kirkwall.

By the time the Commission of Enquiry was set up, it was clear that provision was inadequate. The Commission’s exhaustive report (nearly 6000 pages in total, including evidence; even the index is 300 pages long!) made a series of recommendations:
  • Establishing a Board of Supervision to monitor implementation of the Act
  • Appointing a Parochial Board in all 880 parishes, with responsibility for implementing the Act, and deciding whether to raise funds voluntarily or through a compulsory assessment
  • Each Parochial Board would appoint an Inspector of the Poor to examine all applications for relief
  • Poor relief should be limited to the sick or destitute, and should not be given to the able-bodied poor
  • Parishes could combine to form Combinations to administer relief
  • Poorhouses could be founded by parishes or combinations of parishes with a population of more than 5,000
These recommendations were enacted by the 1845 Act for The Amendment and better Administration of the Laws Relating to the relief of the Poor in Scotland, ​more commonly known as the Poor Law (Scotland) Act. From this point on, poor relief was at least theoretically in the hands of civic rather than ecclesiastical authorities. However, Section 22 of the 1845 Act stipulated that:
​in every such Parish as aforesaid in which the Funds requisite for the Relief of the Poor shall be provided without Assessment the Parochial Board shall consist of the Persons who, if this Act had not been passed, would have been entitled to administer the Laws for the Relief of the Poor in such Parish; and in every such Parish as aforesaid in which it shall have been resolved, as herein-after provided, to raise the Funds requisite for the Relief of the Poor by Assessment, the Parochial Board shall consist of the Owners of Lands and Heritages of the yearly Value of Twenty Pounds and upwards, and of the Provost and Bailies of any Royal Burgh, if any, in such Parish, and of the Kirk Session of such Parish, and of such Number of elected Members, to be elected in manner after mentioned, as shall be fixed by the Board of Supervision
This meant that where a mandatory assessment was used to raise funds for poor relief, the Kirk Session no longer controlled the system, although it was still entitled to appoint up to six members of the Parochial Board. When the Act entered into force, 230 of 880 parishes were subject to statutory assessment. Within a year, that almost doubled to 448 (compared to 432 using voluntary contributions). By 1853, 680 parishes were using statutory assessments, compared to just 202 relying on voluntary contributions. The number of parishes relying on voluntary contributions continued to decline steadily, with only 108 doing so in 1865, and just 51 by 1890.

For genealogists, the implications are clear: after 1845, records of the poor will mostly be found among local government records, mostly held in local council archives around the country. That said, there are significant post-1845 poor records found among the Kirk Session records, not least because as we have seen, in many cases responsibility for poor relief remained with Kirk Sessions long after the Poor Law was enacted.

However, the records of the Board of Supervision, being a national body, are held at the National Records of Scotland. One of the responsibilities of the Board of Supervision was to hear appeals against inadequate relief. These appeals are an excellent source for family history – they will tell you much about the individuals, as well as their families. They often include medical reports, information on the earnings of applicants and their families, names and details of children and the like.

Before 1845, records of poor relief are more often with Kirk Session records. We saw in a previous post how it was possible to trace individual paupers in for instance Kirk Session accounts and other church records. Some of these records can provide excellent detail - we've seen examples of church poor relief records giving names, relationships, occupations, details of payment in kind, poor children being lodged out with other families and so on. They can be therefore be an excellent source for family historians, and should not be neglected.

We are currently working on a national index to a particular set of Poor Law records from 1845 to 1894, which we plan to release later this year.
1 Comment
    Find local and family history records here

    Old Scottish

    Genealogy and Family History  - A mix of our news, curious and intriguing discoveries. Research hints and resources to grow your family tree in Scotland from our team.

    Picture

    Archives

    November 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    September 2021
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

    Categories

    All
    17th Century
    1841
    18th Century
    Aberdeen
    Aberdeenshire
    Aberdour
    Alcohol
    Alexander
    Alyth
    Angus
    Anstruther
    Antiquaries
    Arbroath
    Archaeology
    Architecture
    Archives
    Ardtornish
    Argyll
    Asia
    Associate Congregation
    Asylum
    Athelstaneford
    Atholl
    AtoZChallenge
    Auchmithie
    Auldhame
    Australia
    Ayr
    Ayrshire
    Baird
    Banffshire
    Baptisms
    Barclay
    Barony
    Birse
    Birth Records
    Board Of Supervision
    Book Reviews
    Books
    Borders
    Brewing
    Brick Walls
    Broughton History Society
    Burials
    Cairney
    Cambuskenneth
    Campbell
    Canada
    Candlemas
    Carlops
    Carriden
    Carrington
    Castles
    Cellardyke
    Celtic
    Census
    China
    Cholera
    Church Discipline
    Church History
    Church Records
    Clan Chattan
    Clydeside
    Clyne
    Coal Mining
    Coldstream
    Colinton
    Communion Rolls
    Convicts
    Costume History
    Counties
    Coupar Angus
    Crail
    Crime
    Cumbernauld
    Cupar
    Dalmeny
    Death
    Deskford
    Diaspora
    Dirleton
    Dna
    Douglas
    Drummond
    Drumoak
    Drymen
    Dumbarton
    Dumfries
    Dumfriesshire
    Dunbartonshire
    Dundee
    Dundonald
    Dunnichen
    Earl Of Mar
    East Lothian
    Edinburgh
    Education
    Elgin
    Ellon
    Elsie Inglis
    Emigration
    Erskine
    Events
    Falkirk
    Falkland
    Family History Tips
    Familysearch
    Fife
    Find The Father
    Finlaggan
    Fintry
    Fishing
    Fishtown Of Usan
    Flemish
    Florence Nightingale
    Fochabers
    Forbes
    Forgue
    Fornication
    Forth Road Bridge
    Fossoway
    Fraser
    Free Church Of Scotland
    Free Historical Records
    Gaelic
    Genealogy
    Genetic Genealogy
    Geography
    Glasgow
    Golf
    Gordon
    Graham
    Grant
    Graveyards
    Guest Post
    Gullane
    Haddington
    Halidon-hill
    Hamilton
    Hawick
    Heads Of Families
    Henrietta Taylor
    Heraldry
    Historic Newspapers
    History
    History Of Medicine
    Home Front
    Illegitimacy
    Inchinnan
    Inverkeilor
    Inverness
    Irvine
    Islay
    Jacobites
    Jamaica
    Jewish
    John Kay
    Kennedy
    Kilmarnock
    Kilrenny
    Kinclaven One Place Study
    Kinross-shire
    Kirkcaldy
    Kirk Session
    Kirriemuir
    Lammas
    Lanark
    Lanarkshire
    Law
    Legal History
    Leith
    Levenhall
    Lindsay
    Lords Of The Isles
    Macdonald
    Macgregor
    Mackenzie
    Maps
    Markinch
    Martinmas
    Mary Queen Of Scots
    McFadden
    Medieval History
    Melrose
    Mercer
    Metalworking
    Military History
    Mills
    Mining
    Moidart
    Montrose
    Morham
    Mortcloths
    Motherwell
    Murder
    Musselburgh
    National Archives Of Scotland
    National Library Of Scotland
    National Records Of Scotland
    Naval History
    Newhailes
    North Berwick
    Old Documents
    Old Machar
    Old Scottish News
    One Name Studies
    Online Genealogy
    Ordnance Survey
    Orkney
    Paisley
    Parishes
    Parochial Board
    Partick
    Peebles
    Perth
    Perthshire
    Photography
    Pictish
    Pirates
    Place Names
    Policing
    Political History
    Poorhouses
    Poor Law
    Poor Rolls
    Pottery
    Poverty
    Prehistory
    Presbytery
    Publications
    Railways
    Rayne
    Register Of Corrected Entries
    Registers
    Renfrewshire
    Robert Burns
    Roll Of Honour
    Ross And Cromarty
    Rowan Tree
    Russia
    Ruthven
    Sabbath Breaking
    Schools
    Scone
    Scotland's People
    Scots Language
    Scott
    Scottish Genealogy Research
    Scottish Parliament
    Seton
    Shakespeare
    Sheriff Courts
    Skibo
    Slavery
    Speyside
    St Andrews
    Statutes
    Stewart
    Stirling
    Stirlingshire
    Suffragettes
    Surnames
    Sutherland
    Talks
    Temperance
    Textiles
    The Disruption
    Thornhill
    Today In Scottish History
    Tourism
    Towns
    Tranent
    Transportation
    Transport History
    United Presbyterian Church
    United Secession Church
    United States Of America
    Universities
    Veto Act
    Walter Scott
    War Memorials
    Wars Of Independence
    Waterloo
    WDYTYA
    West Linton
    West Lothian
    Whaling
    Whitelaw
    Whitsun
    Whittingehame
    Witchcraft
    Witches
    Women
    World War I
    WWI

    RSS Feed

Picture
Home
About Old Scottish
Order Online
Contact Us
Terms
Copyright
Privacy







Data Protection Register Registration Number: ZA018996
  • Home
  • Records
    • Board of Supervision
    • Fathers Found
    • Asylum Patients
    • Sheriff Court Paternity Decrees
    • Sheriff Court Extract Decrees
    • School Leaving Certificates
    • Crown Office Cases AD8 >
      • AD8 index 1890 01
      • AD8 index 1890 02
      • AD8 index 1890 03
      • AD8 index 1890 04
      • AD8 index 1890 05
      • AD8 index 1890 06
      • AD8 index 1890 07
      • AD8 index 1890 08
      • AD8 index 1890 09
      • AD8 index 1890 10
      • AD8 index 1890 11
    • Crown Counsel Procedure Books
    • Registers of Deeds
    • General Register of the Poor
    • Registers of Sudden Deaths
    • Anatomy Registers
  • Resources
    • Scottish Genealogy Sources
    • KINCLAVEN One Place Study >
      • Kinclaven 1911 census
      • Kinclaven Parish Church Books
      • Kinclaven Communion Roll 1880-1894
    • Archives in Scotland map
    • Scottish surnames >
      • Surnames-A
      • Surnames-B
      • Surnames-C
      • Surnames-D
      • Surnames-E
      • Surnames-F
      • Surnames-G
      • Surnames-H
      • Surnames-I
      • Surnames-J
      • Surnames-K
      • Surnames-L
      • Surnames-M
      • Surnames-N
      • Surnames-O
      • Surnames-P
      • Surnames-Q
      • Surnames-R
      • Surnames-S
      • Surnames-T
      • Surnames-U
      • Surnames-V
      • Surnames-W
      • Surnames-Y
      • Surnames-Z
    • Statutes
    • Auchterarder in WWI
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Managed Service Customer Login
    • Tourism Partners Login
  • Shop